Derrida: “White Mythology”
Area: Rhetorical and Critical Theory
Content
• Metaphor in the text
o Drawn from the senses—“abstract notions always hide in the senses”
• Possibility of restoring: hides as it is hidden
o Metaphor no longer noticed: double effacement
• Expression of an abstract idea can only be an analogy
• Metaphor is resemblance between two signs
o Analogy within language is an analogy between language
o Resemblance ≠ identity
• One metaphor is always excluded—remains outside the system
o One would have to classify where they came from (biology, chemistry, etc.)
• By classifying, they are lending two discourses: more original and ceasing originality
• Metaphor, then, is an abridged comparison
• (*p. 227): “How are we to know what the temporalizatoin and spatialization of a meaning, of an ideal object, of an intelligible tenor, are, if we have not clarified what ‘space’ and ‘time’ mean?”
• Metaphor is giving a thing a name that belongs to something else
• Metaphor is giving a thing a name that belongs to something else
• Metaphor makes the detour; detour becomes the return;
o Detour is w/I; Metaphor is the concept
• Aristotle: (Rhetoric) : “Analogy is metaphor par excellence”
• *Language alone makes the connection: metaphorical redoubling; bottomless
• Metaphor names its death within itself
Tags
Aristotle
Baudrillard
Bergson
biopower
Bolter
Burke
Cicero
code
Consciousness
control
Deleuze
Derrida
Donald
Doyle
ethics
external
Foucault
Freud
Hauntology
interaction
Isocrates
Latour
literacy
Marx
Memory
metaphor
new media
oration
Plato
posthuman
postmodern
production
Prosthetics/Replacement
QE List
Quintilian
Real
rhetoric
Rhetoric of Science
sophists
storage
technology
Time
truth
Virtual
writing
0 Responses to “Derrida “White Mythology””